Archive forNovember, 2008

Expert: Small Ark. earthquakes could be warning

Expert: Small Ark. earthquakes could be warning

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A series of small earthquakes that rattled central Arkansas in recent weeks could be a sign of something much bigger to come.

By this weekend, seismologists hope to install three measurement devices to gather data about future temblors in the area. That information could show whether the rumbles come from heat-related geological changes or from an undiscovered fault — which could mean a risk of substantial earthquakes in the future.

“The potential for generating a high-magnitude earthquake is real,” said Haydar Al-Shukri, director of the Arkansas Earthquake Center at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock.

Five earthquakes ranging in magnitude from 2.2 to 2.7 have hit central Arkansas this month. Quakes with a magnitude of 2.5 to 3 are typically the smallest felt by people.

While hundreds of earthquakes occur each year, including several in Arkansas, the location of the recent ones give Al-Shukri pause. Arkansas quakes generally occur in the state’s northeast corner, part of the New Madrid Seismic Zone, where three temblors with magnitudes of around 8 struck during the winter of 1812 and smaller ones continue today.

But central Arkansas does not have any seismic history, Al-Shukri said.

“It is abnormal. It is significant,” he said. “We need to carefully watch this activity.”

The area does not have any permanent seismograph, so researchers asked the University of Memphis in Tennessee if they could use its portable equipment. The nearest seismographs aren’t close enough to provide the detailed readings scientists need to determine what could be causing the tremors or properly locate their origin, said Scott Ausbrooks, the geohazard supervisor for the Arkansas Geological Survey.

“I don’t know if you’ve looked at a map of where these events are located, but they’ve got a scatter on them,” he said. “We’re thinking this is probably the inherited error built in when you try to locate events of this small a magnitude from that far away.”

Ausbrooks said officials would install the three seismographs around Magnet Cove, a Hot Spring County community near where a magnitude-2.7 earthquake hit on Nov. 1. Residents told police dispatchers they heard what sounded like an explosion.

One possible culprit could be a hydrothermal quake, caused by extremely hot fluid pushing into rocks under the surface. The hot fluid percolates into the cracks of the rocks and causes movement, Al-Shukri said.

That theory matches the geologic history of the area. Central Arkansas is home to Hot Springs, a city that grew up around its namesake spas. The springs have 143-degree waters rushing to the surface continuously.

If that’s the case, the earthquakes likely wouldn’t pose a drastic danger to the area, Al-Shukri said. At their strongest, such quakes reach only a magnitude of 5, the U.S. Geological Survey’s threshold for “moderate.”

However, if the earthquakes are caused by a previously unknown fault, that could mean a much more powerful temblor in the future. A recently discovered fault in eastern Arkansas near Marianna caused an earthquake with a magnitude of between 7.2 and 7.5 in the past 5,000 years, Al-Shukri said. That could cause widespread, heavy damage.

“Now, it’s not active, but in geologist time, that’s yesterday,” he said.

Ausbrooks wouldn’t speculate on what could be causing the earthquakes, saying he wanted to see what data the seismographs capture. However, he acknowledged an unknown fault could be running through the area.

“There are numerous faults across the state, both known and unknown,” Ausbrooks said. “This area has got a lot of faults associated with it from the mountain building of the Ouachitas, but they’re considered inactive.”

No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments

SEA OF OKHOTSK


Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312
DATE LAT LON MAG DEPTH REGION
24-NOV-2008 18:44:20 53.04 159.56 4.8 66.4 NEAR EAST COAST OF KAMCHATKA
24-NOV-2008 09:02:58 54.18 154.31 7.0 487.5 SEA OF OKHOTSK
19-NOV-2008 08:25:03 53.12 159.65 4.8 63.3 NEAR EAST COAST OF KAMCHATKA
No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments

Strong quake hits China’s Qinghai region


Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

BEIJING (Reuters) – A strong earthquake measuring 6.5 hit a sparsely populated area in China’s western province of Qinghai on Monday, but there were no reports of deaths or injuries.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) originally put the magnitude of the quake at 6.7 but quickly revised it down to 6.5. China’s Xinhua news agency put the magnitude of the tremor at 6.3.

Buildings shook in the remote mining city of Golmud and the regional capital, Xining.

State television said there had been no reports of deaths or injuries.

“We are on the tenth floor, so I felt a very strong tremor 10 minutes ago, but there’s been no damage,” said a Xining government official who only gave her surname, Wang.

The USGS said the epicentre of the quake was 161 km (101 miles)) north-northeast of Golmud at a depth of 9.9 km (6.2 km). Golmud is an industrial city that is dependent upon potassium mining.

Xinhua said some mud houses in Da Qaidam, near the epicentre, had cracks in their walls and a few huts had collapsed. Schools have also been closed.

Seven mining firms in the immediate vicinity had shut as a safety precaution, the Xinhua news agency said, listing coal mines and a base metals mine.

An official at the province’s largest lead-zinc miner, Western Mining, said the company had not received any reports of damage at its mines.

(Reporting by Liu Zhen; Writing by Ben Blanchard and Lucy Hornby; Editing by Ken Wills and Sanjeev Miglani)

No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments

10-NOV-2008 01:22:01 6.5 10.0 QINGHAI, CHINA


Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312
No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments

Mud eruption ’caused by drilling’


Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

 

 

 

 

By James Morgan
Science & Environment reporter, BBC News

Lusi

Lusi has been erupting for two years, leaving 30,000 people homeless

The eruption of the Lusi mud volcano in Indonesia was caused by drilling for oil and gas, a meeting of 74 leading geologists has concluded.

Lusi erupted in May 2006 and continues to spew out boiling mud, displacing around 30,000 people in East Java.

Drilling firm Lapindo Brantas denies a nearby well was the trigger, blaming an earthquake 280km (174 miles) away.

Around 10,000 families who have lost their homes are awaiting compensation, which could run as high as $70m (£43m).

This is the data we wanted to get out – the data I have never been able to show before. It clearly shows that the well failed. It was the driver for the eruption
Professor Richard Davies
Durham University

After debating new evidence at a conference in South Africa, most geologists voted drilling as the cause.

Correspondents describe the result a significant development in the tug-of-war to establish liability for the disaster.

Mud slinging

The debate on the cause of the eruption took place at a meeting of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, in Cape Town.

It was the first time the two opposing sides had agreed to debate before an international conference of independent experts.

The contest was chaired by a professional football referee – Professor John Underhill, an Edinburgh University geologist, who is also a match official in the Scottish Premier League.

We presented clear and indisputable facts that none of the four required factors for the well to have been responsible for triggering the eruption occurred.
Lapindo Brantas spokesman

The dispute centres on some newly released data – measurements taken from the Banjar-Panji-1 exploration well during the final 24 hours leading up to the eruption.

Professor Richard Davies, of Durham University in the UK, argued that these readings clearly point to a build up of pressure, causing fractures which propagated from the bore hole to the surface 150m away, resulting in the eruption.

However, Rocky Sawolo, senior drilling adviser of Lapindo Brantas, used the same primary data to argue the opposite – the pressure within the well was within acceptable limits.

Satellite photo showing the devastation caused by the Lusi mud volcano

His colleague Dr Adriano Mazzini, of the University of Oslo, testified that the fracture was triggered by a magnitude 6.3 earthquake two days earlier, centred on Yogyakarta, some 280km away.

But these claims were directly contradicted by Dr Mark Tingay from Curtin University, Australia, a geological pressure and rock mechanics expert.

The earthquake “was at least an order of magnitude too small,” he said, stressing that the force felt at the Lusi site would have been “very small” – comparable to the effect of a heavy truck passing overhead.

Judgment call

When the vote was called, 42 out of the 74 scientists in the audience were convinced that the drilling was the trigger of the eruption.

Only three voted for the earthquake.

A further 16 scientists believed the evidence was inconclusive, and the remaining 13 felt that a combination of earthquake and drilling was to blame.

map

“The geologists voted overwhelmingly that drilling was the most likely cause,” said Prof Underhill.

“The atmosphere was very tense, so all credit to them for not sitting on their hands.

“Hopefully this will be a catalyst for taking things forward. To my mind the result demonstrates that at the very least, the drilling company have a case to answer.”

Prof Davies said: “I remain convinced that drilling was the cause of the mud volcano.

“The opinion of the international scientists adds further weight to my conviction.”

Lusi

Victims scatter flower petals on their former village, now swamped by mud

For two years, the Lusi crater has been oozing mud – enough to fill 50 Olympic size swimming pools every day.

The eruption began at 0500 on 29 May 2006 in the Porong subdistrict of Sidoarjo, Eastern Java, close to Indonesia’s second city of Surabaya.

All efforts to stem the flow have failed – including a network of dams; channelling into the sea; and an ambitious plan to plug the crater with concrete balls.

Some geologists believe Lusi could continue to erupt for decades.

The mud flow has razed four villages and 25 factories. Thirteen people have died, as a result of a rupture in a natural gas pipeline underneath one of the holding dams.

THE AFTERMATH
Victim of Lusi mud volcano

A police investigation is underway to identify the trigger and to determine whether the drillers are liable for compensating 10,000 families, amounting to 700 billion Indonesian Rupias (US$77; £47m).

If the earthquake is judged responsible, as claimed by Lapindo, then the Indonesian government will have the burden of supporting the victims.

There is no dispute that seismic activity can provoke mud volcanoes, and both are common in East Java.

Nevertheless, in June 2008 Prof Davies published a paper in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters, in which he concluded with “99% certainty” that Lapindo’s drilling caused the mudflow.

He argues that the 2,500m-deep bore hole ruptured limestone rock, containing pressurised water. As the lower part of the borehole was not protected by casing, this forced water and mud into the rocks surrounding the well.

Homes swamped by mud

The volcano ejects enough mud each day to fill 50 Olympic swimming pools

At the conference, he produced fresh records of the changes in pressure in the 24 hours leading up to Lusi’s eruption.

The pressure plots were introduced by drilling engineer Susila Lusiaga, who works with the Indonesian police investigation team.

“The pressure in the well went way beyond what it could tolerate… and it triggered the mud volcano,” he said.

The new records “provide a compelling tape recording of the well as it started to leak,” said Prof Davies.

“This is the data we wanted to get out – the data I have never been able to show before.

“It clearly shows that the well failed. And this failure was the driver for a the breakdown of the rocks – it was the trigger for the mud volcano.”

John Underhill

Debate Chairman John Underhill is also a professional football referee

The well took a huge influx of fluid the day before the eruption, he said, resulting in intolerable pressures, and fractures which propagated until the surface was breached.

“We see the pressure building, then suddenly we see a massive drop at 9.30pm on May 28th – the night before the eruption began.

“This is evidence that a fracture has opened up. It’s like a tyre bursting – the pressure inside bleeds away.

He added: “This may be evidence that Lusi actually started at 9.30pm the night before – not 5am the next morning.”

Lusi

Giant levees have been constructed to contain the mud

“Now the data has been released, I would like to get it out to independent drilling experts, who can then go through it,” said Prof Davies, a geologist.

“We are particularly grateful to Lapindo, who were widely applauded at the meeting for their willingness to take part. We are now starting to make some headway.”

Sticking point

However, despite the vote, the drilling firm strenuously denies that its activities were in any way responsible for the disaster.

From the same primary data, they calculate that the pressures under the ground did not go beyond critical levels.

“We presented clear and indisputable facts that none of the four required factors for the well to have been responsible for triggering the eruption occurred,” a spokesman for Lapindo Brantas said.

“Specifically: there was no uncontrolled ‘kick’. The casing shoe was not breached and the well was intact.

“There was no underground blowout. There was no sustained pressure to propagate a fracture.

 

No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments

WYOMING 03-NOV-2008 13:14:13 4.1Mag


Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312
No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments

Minor quakes hit Dallas area; no damage, injuries


Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/earth/public_html/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

IRVING, Texas – Several minor earthquakes gave some Texas residents an early Halloween scare, shaking their beds and knocking pictures off walls but causing no damage or injuries, authorities said.

A 2.5-magnitude quake at 11:25 p.m. Thursday near Grand Prairie was followed by a series of other small earthquakes in the Dallas suburb, then a 3.0-magnitude quake at 12:01 a.m. Friday in nearby Irving, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Most people in the Dallas area had no idea because the tremors were minor and centered in southwestern Irving. But those who did seemed unnerved by the rare Texas quakes that shook apartment buildings and set off car alarms.

“It’s pretty scary. … The whole bed shakes,” one woman told an Irving 911 operator early Friday morning, according to one of several audiotapes released by the Irving Police Department.

Another caller said he felt jolts about every 10 to 15 minutes and had seen “pictures falling off the wall and all that.”

Irving police received about 25 calls but no reports of injuries or damage, Officer David Tull said.

A 3.1-magnitude earthquake occurred Thursday about 11:30 a.m. near McLoud, Okla., a 5,000-resident town some 180 miles north of Dallas, with no reports of injuries or damage, according to the USGS.

“I didn’t even feel it,” said McLoud Police Chief Gary Roe.

But the quakes in the two states are considered separate events because they occurred so far apart in distance and time, although researchers are not sure if a fault line runs between both cities, said USGS geophysicist Jessica Sigala.

The USGS said a 2.9-magnitude earthquake occurred shortly after noon Friday near Maryville, Tenn., but emergency officials said no damage had been reported.

Maryville is 160 miles east of Nashville.

___

On the Net:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov

No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments